Molloy v. D'Angelillo

267 A.D.2d 65, 699 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12645

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered September 2, 1998, which, in a personal injury action arising from an automobile accident, denied the motion of Action No. 1 defendant Stella I. D’Angelillo for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff had not sustained “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The medical report detailing plaintiff’s “serious injuries” (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), along with plaintiff’s affidavit as to the extent of her disabling symptoms, sufficed to raise a factual issue as to whether plaintiff had sustained “serious injury’ as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and thus to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Greco v Five Five Garage Corp., 123 AD2d 422). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Molloy v. D'Angelillo, 267 A.D.2d 65, 699 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 65 (Molloy v. D'Angelillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greco v. Five Five Garage Corp.
123 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)