Molloy v. Brown
This text of 70 A.2d 336 (Molloy v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
This case involves the construction of a written contract, whereon the suit was based, and the plaintiff’s attempt to vary it by parol evidence without having produced the requisite proof of fraud, accident or mistake in its execution. The pertinent legal principles are horn-book; and nothing is to be gained by repeating the appropriate application given them in the opinion for the court en banc justifying the learned trial judge’s entry of a compulsory nonsuit. On the merit of that opinion, the order refusing to take off the nonsuit will, therefore, be affirmed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 A.2d 336, 364 Pa. 92, 1950 Pa. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molloy-v-brown-pa-1950.