Home/Third Circuit/Mollica v. Restaneo

Mollica v. Restaneo

178 F.3d 1279, 1999 WL 246027
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 12, 1999·No. 98-3416·Published

Opinion

178 F.3d 1279

1999 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,904

Kathy Renda Mollica
v.
Dr. Palmer Restaneo, Christine Restaneo, Parents and Natural
Guardians of Jewel Restaneo, Audiomation Studios,
Digital Dynamics Audio, Inc., BTI
Records, James Sparacino,
Milene Music, Inc.

NO. 98-3416

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

March 12, 1999

Appeal From: W.D.Pa. ,No.96cv02210

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mollica v. Restaneo, 178 F.3d 1279, 1999 WL 246027 (3d Cir. 1999).

178 F.3d 1279 (Mollica v. Restaneo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.