Mollica v. Restaneo
178 F.3d 1279, 1999 WL 246027
This text of 178 F.3d 1279 (Mollica v. Restaneo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mollica v. Restaneo, 178 F.3d 1279, 1999 WL 246027 (3d Cir. 1999).
Opinion
178 F.3d 1279
1999 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,904
Kathy Renda Mollica
v.
Dr. Palmer Restaneo, Christine Restaneo, Parents and Natural
Guardians of Jewel Restaneo, Audiomation Studios,
Digital Dynamics Audio, Inc., BTI
Records, James Sparacino,
Milene Music, Inc.
NO. 98-3416
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
March 12, 1999
Appeal From: W.D.Pa. ,No.96cv02210
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 F.3d 1279, 1999 WL 246027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mollica-v-restaneo-ca3-1999.