Mollet v. Mollet

99 A.D.3d 1007, 952 N.Y.2d 470
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 2012·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

“ ‘ “In order to modify an existing custody or visitation arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child” ’ ” (Matter of Francois v Grimm, 84 AD3d 1082 [2011], quoting Matter of Peralta v Irrizary, 76 AD3d 561, 562 [2010]; see Family Ct Act § 652). “The best interests of the child are determined by a review of the totality of the circumstances” (Matter of Garcia v Fountain, 82 AD3d 979, 980 [2011]).

[1008] Here, the Family Court’s award of sole legal and physical custody of the subject child to the mother has a sound and substantial basis in the record and will not be disturbed (see Matter of McDonough v McDonough, 73 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2010]; Matter of Tercjak v Tercjak, 49 AD3d 772 [2008]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Eng, EJ., Skelos, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mollet v. Mollet, 99 A.D.3d 1007, 952 N.Y.2d 470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

99 A.D.3d 1007 (Mollet v. Mollet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McVey v. Barnett
107 A.D.3d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Luo v. Yang
103 A.D.3d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)