Molle v. Jacob Kohlberg & Co.

California Supreme Court

Molle v. Jacob Kohlberg & Co.

1 Cal. Unrep. 58

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1857

DocketNo. 1415

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 58 (Molle v. Jacob Kohlberg & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molle v. Jacob Kohlberg & Co., 1 Cal. Unrep. 58 (Cal. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

TERRY, J.

— The only error assigned is the refusal of the court to continue the cause on application of defendants.

[59]*59"We think the continuance was properly refused. The answer was filed on the 6th of June, 1856, and no effort was made to procure the testimony until the 2d of October, when a subpoena was issued for a nonresident witness. This was not such diligence as would authorize a postponement of the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

I concur: Burnett, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TERRY, J.

— The only error assigned is the refusal of the court to continue the cause on application of defendants.

[59]*59"We think the continuance was properly refused. The answer was filed on the 6th of June, 1856, and no effort was made to procure the testimony until the 2d of October, when a subpoena was issued for a nonresident witness. This was not such diligence as would authorize a postponement of the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

I concur: Burnett, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molle-v-jacob-kohlberg-co-cal-1857.