Moll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moll v. State

667 So. 2d 508, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1382, 1996 WL 61361

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 1996

DocketNo. 96-54

StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 508 (Moll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moll v. State, 667 So. 2d 508, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1382, 1996 WL 61361 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s motion to accept brief is treated as a motion for rehearing, which is granted. The petition for certiorari will be treated as a timely appeal. See Beshaw v. State, 586 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); see also Skinner v. Skinner, 561 So.2d 260 (Fla.1990). The court withdraws its prior order and substitutes in its place the following opinion:

The order under review is summarily affirmed on authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI