Moll v. State

667 So. 2d 508, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1382, 1996 WL 61361
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 1996·No. No. 96-54·Published

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s motion to accept brief is treated as a motion for rehearing, which is granted. The petition for certiorari will be treated as a timely appeal. See Beshaw v. State, 586 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); see also Skinner v. Skinner, 561 So.2d 260 (Fla.1990). The court withdraws its prior order and substitutes in its place the following opinion:

The order under review is summarily affirmed on authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moll v. State, 667 So. 2d 508, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1382, 1996 WL 61361 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

667 So. 2d 508 (Moll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skinner v. Skinner
561 So. 2d 260 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Beshaw v. State
586 So. 2d 1284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)