Moline v. Queensboro Storage Warehouse, Inc.

155 Misc. 360, 278 N.Y.S. 179, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1960
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 19, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

The action is in conversion against defendant warehouse corporation for its failure to give notice of sale pursuant to section 118 of the General Business Law. The statute provides, among other things, that the warehouseman shall give a written notice to the [361] person on whose account the goods are held. * * * Such notice shall be given by delivery in person or by registered letter addressed to the last known place of business or abode of the person to be notified.”

Concededly, plaintiff never received such notice. There is no dispute, however, that defendant sent a notice by registered letter correctly addressed to plaintiff, which was returned as “ unclaimed.” Under these circumstances, we believe that defendant sufficiently complied with the requirements of the statute as to the giving of notice.

Present, MacCrate, Lewis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moline v. Queensboro Storage Warehouse, Inc., 155 Misc. 360, 278 N.Y.S. 179, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

155 Misc. 360 (Moline v. Queensboro Storage Warehouse, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. Condron
1943 OK 340 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1943)
Hackett v. Nelson Express & Storage Co.
162 Misc. 444 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)