Moline Plow Co. v. State Treasurer
This text of 1 McGrath 1007 (Moline Plow Co. v. State Treasurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel respondent to refund tbe amount wbicb was exacted from relator under Act No. 79, Laws of 1891, and paid by it under protest.
Denied April 16, 1895, witb costs.
Delator insisted that the act bad been declared unconstitutional in Coit vs. Sutton, 102 M., 324; that the payment made was involuntary, and that the act invalidated the contracts made by relators, unless its provisions were complied with. First National Bank vs. Watkins, 21 M., 489; Nickodemus vs. East Saginaw, 25 M., 456.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 1007, 105 McGrath 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moline-plow-co-v-state-treasurer-mich-1895.