Molinaro v. Driver

Michigan Supreme Court

Molinaro v. Driver

115 N.W.2d 125, 366 Mich. 405, 1962 Mich. LEXIS 514

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 1962

DocketDocket No. 17, Calendar No. 49,104

StatusPublished

This text of 115 N.W.2d 125 (Molinaro v. Driver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molinaro v. Driver, 115 N.W.2d 125, 366 Mich. 405, 1962 Mich. LEXIS 514 (Mich. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Dethmbrs, J.

For the facts, see our opinion in this same case reported in 364 Mich 341. Defendant Driver was represented by an attorney who took an appeal forthwith to this Court from the lower court’s, decree for plaintiffs. The other defendants, appellants here now, were represented by another attorney who, after entry of the adverse decree, first moved for a rehearing, which was denied, and this, their appeal therefrom, then followed. Thus, appeal in effect from 1 decree in 1 ease involving multiple defendants, became 2 appeals in this Court.

Our opinion and decision in the Driver appeal, 364 Mich 341, is controlling, requiring that the decree-below be and it is affirmed, without costs.

Carr, C. J., and Kelly, Black, Kavanagh, Souris,, Otis M. Smith, and Adams, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dethmbrs, J.

For the facts, see our opinion in this same case reported in 364 Mich 341. Defendant Driver was represented by an attorney who took an appeal forthwith to this Court from the lower court’s, decree for plaintiffs. The other defendants, appellants here now, were represented by another attorney who, after entry of the adverse decree, first moved for a rehearing, which was denied, and this, their appeal therefrom, then followed. Thus, appeal in effect from 1 decree in 1 ease involving multiple defendants, became 2 appeals in this Court.

Our opinion and decision in the Driver appeal, 364 Mich 341, is controlling, requiring that the decree-below be and it is affirmed, without costs.

Carr, C. J., and Kelly, Black, Kavanagh, Souris,, Otis M. Smith, and Adams, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 N.W.2d 125, 366 Mich. 405, 1962 Mich. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molinaro-v-driver-mich-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack