Molinari v. Swanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Molinari v. Swanson

97 A.D.2d 816, 468 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20589

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 816 (Molinari v. Swanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molinari v. Swanson, 97 A.D.2d 816, 468 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to require defendants Dennis and Jane Swanson to remove their encroaching fence from plaintiffs’ property, defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Goldberg, J.), entered March 25, 1983, which, inter alia, denied its motion to dismiss the complaint and directed plaintiffs to appear for an examination before trial in Richmond County rather than New York County. Order modified by deleting the provision directing that the examination before trial be held in Richmond County and by substituting a provision directing that plaintiffs appear for said examination in New York County, at a time and place to be set by agreement of counsel. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs were obligated to comply with the notice to appear for depositions in New York County (Allen v Brower, 21 AD2d 876). Special Term correctly concluded, however, that the circumstances do not warrant a dismissal of the action. Mollen, P. J., Mangano; Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to require defendants Dennis and Jane Swanson to remove their encroaching fence from plaintiffs’ property, defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Goldberg, J.), entered March 25, 1983, which, inter alia, denied its motion to dismiss the complaint and directed plaintiffs to appear for an examination before trial in Richmond County rather than New York County. Order modified by deleting the provision directing that the examination before trial be held in Richmond County and by substituting a provision directing that plaintiffs appear for said examination in New York County, at a time and place to be set by agreement of counsel. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs were obligated to comply with the notice to appear for depositions in New York County (Allen v Brower, 21 AD2d 876). Special Term correctly concluded, however, that the circumstances do not warrant a dismissal of the action. Mollen, P. J., Mangano; Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 816, 468 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molinari-v-swanson-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack