Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Molinari v. State

Molinari v. State

792 So. 2d 583, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11124, 2001 WL 883317
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-740
StatusPublished

This text of 792 So. 2d 583 (Molinari v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Molinari v. State, 792 So. 2d 583, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11124, 2001 WL 883317 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bolin v. State, 736 So.2d 1160, 1166 (Fla.1999) (“[T]he decision as to individual and sequestered voir dire is a discretionary decision for the trial judge.”); See also Way v. State, 774 So.2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Salas v. State, 544 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). See also Robinson v.. State, 438 So.2d 8, 9 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (addressing the procedure to be followed when a claim of potentially prejudicial publicity arises after the jury has been selected); Bullard v. State, 324 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Way v. State
774 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Salas v. State
544 So. 2d 1040 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Robinson v. State
438 So. 2d 8 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Bolin v. State
736 So. 2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Mills v. State
324 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
792 So. 2d 583, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11124, 2001 WL 883317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molinari-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.