Molinari v. State
792 So. 2d 583, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11124, 2001 WL 883317
Opinion
Affirmed. See Bolin v. State, 736 So.2d 1160, 1166 (Fla.1999) (“[T]he decision as to individual and sequestered voir dire is a discretionary decision for the trial judge.”); See also Way v. State, 774 So.2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Salas v. State, 544 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). See also Robinson v.. State, 438 So.2d 8, 9 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (addressing the procedure to be followed when a claim of potentially prejudicial publicity arises after the jury has been selected); Bullard v. State, 324 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Molinari v. State, 792 So. 2d 583, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11124, 2001 WL 883317 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
792 So. 2d 583 (Molinari v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Way v. State
774 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Salas v. State
544 So. 2d 1040 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Robinson v. State
438 So. 2d 8 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Bolin v. State
736 So. 2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Mills v. State
324 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)