Molinari v. Maryland

Supreme Court

Molinari v. Maryland

263 U.S. 685, 44 S. Ct. 179, 68 L. Ed. 506, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2837

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1924·No. No. 127; No. 480·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.

Affirmed with costs upon, the authority of: (1) Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403; (2) Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506, 518; Commissioners v. Bancroft, 203 U. S. 112, 118-119; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 362.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.

Affirmed with costs upon, the authority of: (1) Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403; (2) Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506, 518; Commissioners v. Bancroft, 203 U. S. 112, 118-119; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 362.

Molinari v. Maryland, 263 U.S. 685, 44 S. Ct. 179, 68 L. Ed. 506, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2837 (1924).

Pincite

263 U.S. 685 (Molinari v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related