Molina v. United States

216 F. App'x 828
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2007
DocketNo. 06-14160
StatusPublished

This text of 216 F. App'x 828 (Molina v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Molina v. United States, 216 F. App'x 828 (11th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Olegario Pineda Molina, proceeding pro se, challenges the district court’s dismissal of his pro se motion to vacate his sentence, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court dismissed Pineda Molina’s motion as time-barred, but granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) as to the underlying constitutional claims raised in the motion. “When a district court dismisses a petition as time-barred, it is inappropriate to grant a COA on the constitutional claim.... ” Ross v. Moore, 246 F.3d 1299, 1300 (11th Cir.2001) (involving petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254). Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order granting a COA and remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether Pineda Molina’s § 2255 motion was time-barred.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bobby B. Ross v. Michael Moore
246 F.3d 1299 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F. App'x 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molina-v-united-states-ca11-2007.