Molina v. Norosky

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Molina v. Norosky

184 A.2d 845, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 389

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1962·No. No. 3072·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this intersection collision case the trial court found for defendant, and plaintiff seeks reversal. On conflicting evidence the court could have found that defendant did not obey a stop sign, or could have found that plaintiff was driving at an excessive rate of speed and without giving proper attention to traffic conditions ahead of him. Plaintiff was by no means entitled to a finding as a matter of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this intersection collision case the trial court found for defendant, and plaintiff seeks reversal. On conflicting evidence the court could have found that defendant did not obey a stop sign, or could have found that plaintiff was driving at an excessive rate of speed and without giving proper attention to traffic conditions ahead of him. Plaintiff was by no means entitled to a finding as a matter of law.

Affirmed.

Molina v. Norosky, 184 A.2d 845, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 389 (D.C. 1962).

Pincite

184 A.2d 845 (Molina v. Norosky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.