Molina v. Dennison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Molina v. Dennison

41 A.D.3d 1106, 837 N.Y.S.2d 597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 A.D.3d 1106 (Molina v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molina v. Dennison, 41 A.D.3d 1106, 837 N.Y.S.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J), entered August 3, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an August 2004 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Supreme Court subsequently dismissed the proceeding and petitioner appealed. On August 22, 2006, after he filed his appeal, petitioner reappeared [1107]*1107before the Board and his request for parole release again was denied. In light of this, the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Rivera v Travis, 8 AD3d 716, 716-717 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J), entered August 3, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an August 2004 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Supreme Court subsequently dismissed the proceeding and petitioner appealed. On August 22, 2006, after he filed his appeal, petitioner reappeared [1107]*1107before the Board and his request for parole release again was denied. In light of this, the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Rivera v Travis, 8 AD3d 716, 716-717 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 1106, 837 N.Y.S.2d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molina-v-dennison-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack