Molesworth v. Municipal Court

304 N.E.2d 425, 364 Mass. 830, 1973 Mass. LEXIS 476
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 30, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 304 N.E.2d 425 (Molesworth v. Municipal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Molesworth v. Municipal Court, 304 N.E.2d 425, 364 Mass. 830, 1973 Mass. LEXIS 476 (Mass. 1973).

Opinion

This is a petition for a writ ofxcertiorari and relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. It appears that the respondent Krupinski had brought a small claims action in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston against the petitioner on which there was a hearing with a finding in favor of Krupinski and the issuance of an execution. Following this finding and issuance the court denied a motion of the petitioner to revoke the order issuing the execution and for leave to appeal to the Superior Court for a jury trial. This petition was thereafter filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County and the single justice entered an order sustaining a demurrer to which exception was taken. There was no error. The petitioner failed to protect his rights to remove his case to the Superior Court under the provisions of G. L. c. 218, § 23, prior to its amendment by St. 1973, c. 748, § 2. Since his claim for a jury trial was not seasonably filed, the judge who denied the motion to revoke the order issuing the execution and for leave to appeal acted properly within his discretion. See discussion in McLaughlin v. Municipal Court of the Roxbury Dist. of Boston, 308 Mass. 397, 402 (1941). Having failed to remove the case to the Superior Court under the provisions of G. L. c. 218, § 23, the petitioner had waived his right to a trial by jury. See Foster v. Morse, 132 Mass. 354, 355 (1882); H. K. Webster Co. v. Mann, 269 Mass. 381, 385 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.

Thomas F. McCarthy & Howard J. Alperin for the petitioner. Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General, & James P. McCarthy, Assistant Attorney General, for the respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bigelow Auto Body, Inc. v. Doyle
1990 Mass. App. Div. 41 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1990)
Auburn v. Cappadona
1983 Mass. App. Div. 146 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1983)
Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.
369 N.E.2d 975 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1977)
Brunson v. Commonwealth
337 N.E.2d 895 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 N.E.2d 425, 364 Mass. 830, 1973 Mass. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molesworth-v-municipal-court-mass-1973.