Moles v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORY WAYNE DIVISION

JENNIFER MOLES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:24-CV-425-GSL-JEM

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Findings, Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C) [DE 24] entered by Magistrate Judge John E. Martin on September 8, 2025. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Martin recommends that the Court grant the relief requested in plaintiff’s Brief in Support of the Request for Review [DE 13] and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with the Report. [DE 24, page 8]. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Martin’s Report in full, and therefore GRANTS the relief requested in Plaintiff’s Brief in Support of the Request for Review [DE 13] and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings consistent with Judge Martin’s Report [DE 24]. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: September 23, 2025

/s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court