Mole, Stephen AKA MOLE, STEPHEN DAVID
This text of Mole, Stephen AKA MOLE, STEPHEN DAVID (Mole, Stephen AKA MOLE, STEPHEN DAVID) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-74,881-01
EX PARTE STEPHEN DAVID MOLE, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. F-2006-1308-AWCH1 IN THE 16TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM DENTON COUNTY
Per curiam.
O R D E R
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was charged in a single indictment and convicted of one count of intoxication manslaughter and two counts of intoxication assault. He was sentenced by a jury to twenty years’ imprisonment for the intoxication manslaughter, ten years’ imprisonment for one of the intoxication assault counts, to be served consecutively with the twenty-year sentence, and ten years probated for the second intoxication assault count, to run concurrently with the twenty-year sentence. The Second District Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Mole v. State, No. 02-08-021-CR (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, April 23, 2009).
On October 15, 2010, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Applicant’s habeas application. The trial court recommended that relief be denied.
The trial court’s findings, conclusions and recommendation are correct with respect to the two counts for which Applicant has final convictions. However, with respect to Count II of the indictment, Applicant’s probated sentence has not been revoked, and is therefore not a final conviction for purposes of habeas review. Therefore, Applicant’s grounds for habeas review are denied as they pertain to Counts I and III of the indictment, and dismissed as they pertain to Count II.
Filed: November 17, 2010
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mole, Stephen AKA MOLE, STEPHEN DAVID, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mole-stephen-aka-mole-stephen-david-texcrimapp-2010.