Molander v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Florida

Molander v. Harvey

131 So. 2d 7, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2195

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 1961

DocketNo. 30945

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 So. 2d 7 (Molander v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molander v. Harvey, 131 So. 2d 7, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2195 (Fla. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, dated February 8, 1961, as amended by its decision dated the 4th day of April, 1961, in which it dismissed an appeal taken from a final judgment of the Probate Judge of Volusia County by Jane Robertson Molander because said appeal was taken more than thirty but less than sixty days after the date of the rendition thereof, is in direct conflict with the opinion of this Court in In re Wartman’s Estate, Fla.1961, 128 So.2d 600. The latter decision was rendered by this Court subsequent to the date of the trial court judgment and the decision of the District Court. Also see Congregation Temple de Hirsch of Seattle v. Aronson, Fla.1961, 128 So.2d 585. In consideration of the foregoing it is ordered that the foregoing decisions of the District Court are hereby vacated and set aside with directions to reinstate said appeal and dispose of the same in due course as if said motion had never been made and granted.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., and McLANE, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, dated February 8, 1961, as amended by its decision dated the 4th day of April, 1961, in which it dismissed an appeal taken from a final judgment of the Probate Judge of Volusia County by Jane Robertson Molander because said appeal was taken more than thirty but less than sixty days after the date of the rendition thereof, is in direct conflict with the opinion of this Court in In re Wartman’s Estate, Fla.1961, 128 So.2d 600. The latter decision was rendered by this Court subsequent to the date of the trial court judgment and the decision of the District Court. Also see Congregation Temple de Hirsch of Seattle v. Aronson, Fla.1961, 128 So.2d 585. In consideration of the foregoing it is ordered that the foregoing decisions of the District Court are hereby vacated and set aside with directions to reinstate said appeal and dispose of the same in due course as if said motion had never been made and granted.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., and McLANE, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 So. 2d 7, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molander-v-harvey-fla-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack