Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 28, 2026·No. SCWC-24-0000802·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 28-JUL-2026 07:11 AM Dkt. 5 ODSAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

VINCENZO MOLA, Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

vs.

INDIRA LOPEZ-RUIZ, Petitioner/Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Jackson, assigned by reason of vacancy)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate

Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of

certiorari was filed, see Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)

(2017); see also Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),

It is ordered that Petitioner’s application for writ

of certiorari, filed July 24, 2026, is dismissed without

prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2023) (“The application shall be filed within thirty

days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’

judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for

filing the application is extended in accordance with this

rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 28, 2026.

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Kauanoe A.D. Jackson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz, (haw 2026).

Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz (Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.