Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 28-JUL-2026 07:11 AM Dkt. 5 ODSAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
VINCENZO MOLA, Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
vs.
INDIRA LOPEZ-RUIZ, Petitioner/Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Jackson, assigned by reason of vacancy)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate
Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of
certiorari was filed, see Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)
(2017); see also Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)
Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),
It is ordered that Petitioner’s application for writ
of certiorari, filed July 24, 2026, is dismissed without
prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2023) (“The application shall be filed within thirty
days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’
judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for
filing the application is extended in accordance with this
rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 28, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Kauanoe A.D. Jackson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz (Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.