Moke Realty Corp. v. Bruckner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moke Realty Corp. v. Bruckner

51 A.D.2d 1005, 380 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11765

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1005 (Moke Realty Corp. v. Bruckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moke Realty Corp. v. Bruckner, 51 A.D.2d 1005, 380 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover on a tentative binder of fire insurance, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 12, 1975, which granted defendant’s application for summary judgment upon submission of an agreed statement of facts and the exhibits submitted therewith. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The "Plan of Operation” and the "Outline of Procedure” of the New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association (the Association) govern the effective date of fire and extended coverage insurance. Pursuant to these documents, when the Association fails to inspect a property, or fails to act on an inspection already made, within 17 days of its receipt of the insurance application, then, upon payment of the estimated premium, it will issue a binding receipt. The fact that the findings of an inspection made within this period have been recorded on a form and that this form has been sent to the office of the Association does not constitute the "act on an inspection already made” contemplated by the plan. The only act logically relevant would be notification to the applicant (based upon the inspection) of declination or approval, as spelled out more specifically in the Association’s "Outline of Procedure”. Absent such notification, the applicant must wait 17 days after receipt of his application by the Association before it can be deemed to be insured. Here, although there was an inspection of the premises, no action had been taken thereon by the Association. Therefore, the earliest day coverage could begin was March 16, 1970, 17 days after the Association’s receipt of the application. There was, therefore, no insurance coverage in effect on the day of the fire, March 14, 1970. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Christ and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to recover on a tentative binder of fire insurance, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 12, 1975, which granted defendant’s application for summary judgment upon submission of an agreed statement of facts and the exhibits submitted therewith. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The "Plan of Operation” and the "Outline of Procedure” of the New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association (the Association) govern the effective date of fire and extended coverage insurance. Pursuant to these documents, when the Association fails to inspect a property, or fails to act on an inspection already made, within 17 days of its receipt of the insurance application, then, upon payment of the estimated premium, it will issue a binding receipt. The fact that the findings of an inspection made within this period have been recorded on a form and that this form has been sent to the office of the Association does not constitute the "act on an inspection already made” contemplated by the plan. The only act logically relevant would be notification to the applicant (based upon the inspection) of declination or approval, as spelled out more specifically in the Association’s "Outline of Procedure”. Absent such notification, the applicant must wait 17 days after receipt of his application by the Association before it can be deemed to be insured. Here, although there was an inspection of the premises, no action had been taken thereon by the Association. Therefore, the earliest day coverage could begin was March 16, 1970, 17 days after the Association’s receipt of the application. There was, therefore, no insurance coverage in effect on the day of the fire, March 14, 1970. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Christ and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1005, 380 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moke-realty-corp-v-bruckner-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack