Mok Chung v. United States
This text of 133 F. 166 (Mok Chung v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mok Chung, a Chinaman, arrived at the port of San Francisco on the steamship San Jose, and applied to the collector of the port of San Francisco for permission to land, on the ground that he was a native-born citizen of the United States. Upon a hearing had before the collector of the port, his application was denied. He thereupon sued out a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that he was a native-born citizen of the United States. Upon a hearing had upon that writ, and the return thereto, and the evidence taken, the court found the petitioner to be a subject of the empire of China, and not entitled to land in the United States, and ordered him deported. From that judgment an appeal was taken to this court.
The appellee now moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the District Court had no jurisdiction to issue the writ of habeas corpus, for the reason that the appellant had taken no appeal to the Secretary of Commerce and Labor from the decision of the collector of the port of San Francisco denying his right to land. On the authority of United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U. S. 161, 24 Sup. Ct. 621, 48 L. Ed. 917, the motion is overruled, but the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 F. 166, 66 C.C.A. 292, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mok-chung-v-united-states-ca9-1904.