Mojica v. Ulrim Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mojica v. Ulrim Realty Corp.

10 A.D.2d 559, 200 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 559 (Mojica v. Ulrim Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mojica v. Ulrim Realty Corp., 10 A.D.2d 559, 200 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for the defendant-respondent and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of the appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for the defendant-respondent and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of the appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 559, 200 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mojica-v-ulrim-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1960.