Mojica v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mojica v. Goord

249 A.D.2d 606, 670 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 606 (Mojica v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mojica v. Goord, 249 A.D.2d 606, 670 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that the determination under review in this proceeding has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s records. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that the determination under review in this proceeding has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s records. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 606, 670 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mojica-v-goord-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack