Moit v. Chesebro-Whitman Co.

87 A.D.2d 573, 450 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 1, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 573 (Moit v. Chesebro-Whitman Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moit v. Chesebro-Whitman Co., 87 A.D.2d 573, 450 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

In this products liability, negligence and breach of warranty action, the defendant manufacturer appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated January 8, 1981, which denied its motion for a protective order to vacate plaintiffs’ notice for discovery and inspection, and directed said defendant to furnish to the plaintiffs certain items. Order modified, by deleting therefrom the paragraph beginning with the word “Defendant” and ending with the word “entry”, and substituting therefor the following: “Defendant Chesebro-Whitman Company is directed to furnish plaintiffs with all necessary and relevant records, documents, memoranda and reports with respect to similar claims or the title and index number of litigation arising out of any negligence or defects with respect to the failure of wooden rungs upon the ‘Gold Medal’ and/or ‘Suburban Extension Ladders’ [574]*574manufactured by this defendant at its plant located at Newark Valley, New York, for the period from 1960, up to and including the date of the occurrence, and any modification in the design specifications for this type of ladder during said period are also directed to be produced.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (Pataki v Kiseda, 80 AD2d 100; Abrams v Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co., 37 AD2d 833). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.
175 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Williamsville Central School District v. Cannon Partnership
162 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Zimmerman v. New York City Transit Authority
115 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Dattmore v. Eagan Real Estate, Inc.
112 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Boone v. Supermarkets General Corp.
109 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.2d 573, 450 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moit-v-chesebro-whitman-co-nyappdiv-1982.