Moises Saavedra v. Electric Fixture Supply, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 5, 2007
Docket13-06-00674-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Moises Saavedra v. Electric Fixture Supply, Inc. (Moises Saavedra v. Electric Fixture Supply, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moises Saavedra v. Electric Fixture Supply, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion





NUMBER13-06-674-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________



MOISES SAAVEDRA, Appellant,



v.


ELECTRIC FIXTURE SUPPLY, INC., Appellee.



On appeal from the 197th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, MOISES SAAVEDRA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2006-12-5575-C. The clerk's record was filed on February 14, 2007. The reporter's record was filed on February 1, 2007. Appellant's brief was due on March 16, 2007. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On April 10, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 5th day of July, 2007



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moises Saavedra v. Electric Fixture Supply, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moises-saavedra-v-electric-fixture-supply-inc-texapp-2007.