Moir v. Moir

Oregon Supreme Court

Moir v. Moir

253 P.2d 900, 197 Or. 399, 1953 Ore. LEXIS 182

DecidedFebruary 18, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 253 P.2d 900 (Moir v. Moir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moir v. Moir, 253 P.2d 900, 197 Or. 399, 1953 Ore. LEXIS 182 (Or. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff husband sued for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The wife answered with a prayer for a dismissal. The parties have been married since 1919 and have one child, a daughter who has long since attained her majority. Plaintiff appeals from the resulting decree of dismissal.

We have examined the record and read the briefs with care. The appeal presents no questions of law [400]*400compelling consideration. The learned trial judge has a wide and long experience in matters of this ldnd. He saw and heard the witnesses and, under the circumstances, is in a favored position from whence to resolve the merits. Our own reading of the testimony leads us to the same conclusions and gives further confirmation to his judgment.

Finding no error, we affirm the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff husband sued for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The wife answered with a prayer for a dismissal. The parties have been married since 1919 and have one child, a daughter who has long since attained her majority. Plaintiff appeals from the resulting decree of dismissal.

We have examined the record and read the briefs with care. The appeal presents no questions of law [400]*400compelling consideration. The learned trial judge has a wide and long experience in matters of this ldnd. He saw and heard the witnesses and, under the circumstances, is in a favored position from whence to resolve the merits. Our own reading of the testimony leads us to the same conclusions and gives further confirmation to his judgment.

Finding no error, we affirm the decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 P.2d 900, 197 Or. 399, 1953 Ore. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moir-v-moir-or-1953.