Moiha v. O'Malley
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
JENISE MOIHA, ) CIVIL NO. 21-00130 JAO-RT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION ) TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. ) ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) )
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Before the Court is Plaintiff Jenise Moiha’s (“Plaintiff”) Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Application”), filed March 15, 2021. A court may authorize the commencement or prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit that the person is unable to pay such fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)). Absolute destitution is not required to obtain benefits under the IFP statute, but “a plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty ‘with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.’” Id. (citation omitted). In the present case, the Court finds that Plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated entitlement to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff receives state assistance and food stamps benefits totaling $250.00 and $420.00, respectively.! Plaintiff represents that she has no other source of income, that she has a $40.00 balance in her checking or savings account, and that she has no assets. This information establishes that Plaintiff's annual income falls well below the poverty threshold for a one-person household in Hawai‘i, which is currently $14,820.00. Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines, 86 Fed. Reg. 7732-0185 (Feb. 1, 2021). Because Plaintiff has made the requisite showing under § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court HEREBY GRANTS her IFP Application. ECF No. 4. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, March 16, 2021. au pat Ty, = ais i yy” B % hf: Don
% □ Jill A. Otake > ‘ "a United States District Judge : tn TK —
CIVIL NO. 21-00130 JAO-RT; MOIHA V. SAUL; ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
' Although Plaintiff has not indicated how frequently she receives these benefits, the Court assumes they are monthly benefits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moiha v. O'Malley (Moiha v. O'Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.