Moies v. O'Niell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Moies v. O'Niell

23 N.J. Eq. 207

DecidedMay 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 23 N.J. Eq. 207 (Moies v. O'Niell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moies v. O'Niell, 23 N.J. Eq. 207 (N.J. Ct. App. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The defendant has fully answered every allegation in the bill on which an equity could be raised either for an injunction or receiver. The partnership business may be unprofit[208]*208able, and it may be that the partnership should be dissolved or discontinued. But there is no reason for enjoining O’Neill from proceeding with the business and settling up the affairs, or to take the property out of his hands to be administered by the expensive 'and destructive machinery of a receiver in chancery.

The injunction must be entirely dissolved, and the motion for receiver is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The defendant has fully answered every allegation in the bill on which an equity could be raised either for an injunction or receiver. The partnership business may be unprofit[208]*208able, and it may be that the partnership should be dissolved or discontinued. But there is no reason for enjoining O’Neill from proceeding with the business and settling up the affairs, or to take the property out of his hands to be administered by the expensive 'and destructive machinery of a receiver in chancery.

The injunction must be entirely dissolved, and the motion for receiver is refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 N.J. Eq. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moies-v-oniell-njch-1872.