Mohrmann v. Town of Bloomfield
This text of 138 A. 926 (Mohrmann v. Town of Bloomfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Two writs are applied for; one to review an ordinance of the town of Bloomfield appropriating money for the purchase of fire hose, and another to review the resolution awarding the contract to the Fabric Fire Hose Company.
After full and careful examination of the points made by the prosecutor in the light of affidavits we are of the opinion that there is no irregularity either in the ordinance or the resolution, or in the proceedings leading up to either, sufficient in our judgment to justify us in awarding either writ applied for.
Both applications are denied accordingly, but without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 A. 926, 5 N.J. Misc. 885, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohrmann-v-town-of-bloomfield-nj-1927.