Mohney v. Springstead

281 A.D.2d 991, 722 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2835
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly determined that it was in the best interests of the child to award joint custody to the parties, with physical placement of the child with petitioner, his father. In making its custody determination, the court properly considered the “child’s emotional and intellectual development, the quality of [992]*992the home environment and the parental guidance provided” (Matter of Louise E.S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946, 947), and the court was in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses in determining the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Paul C. v Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 956). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Claire, J.— Custody.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohney v. Springstead, 281 A.D.2d 991, 722 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 991 (Mohney v. Springstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Felice v. De Felice
303 A.D.2d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)