Mohen v. Mooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mohen v. Mooney

205 A.D.2d 673, 614 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 673 (Mohen v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mohen v. Mooney, 205 A.D.2d 673, 614 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, which was converted into an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated September 30, 1992, which denied their motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5020 and 5021 to direct the defendants to execute and file an unconditional and full satisfaction of the judgment entered in their favor on May 18, 1992, following the tender of payment thereof, without any reservation of rights to appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants offered the plaintiffs a full satisfaction of judgment in a form acceptable to the Clerk’s office, in full compliance with the dictates of CPLR 5021 (a) (3). The defendants’ reservation of both parties’ rights to pursue their appeals did not render the satisfaction any less effective in removing the judgment of record. Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, which was converted into an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated September 30, 1992, which denied their motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5020 and 5021 to direct the defendants to execute and file an unconditional and full satisfaction of the judgment entered in their favor on May 18, 1992, following the tender of payment thereof, without any reservation of rights to appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants offered the plaintiffs a full satisfaction of judgment in a form acceptable to the Clerk’s office, in full compliance with the dictates of CPLR 5021 (a) (3). The defendants’ reservation of both parties’ rights to pursue their appeals did not render the satisfaction any less effective in removing the judgment of record. Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 673, 614 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohen-v-mooney-nyappdiv-1994.