Mohawk v. Key Motors of Reno, LLC

D. Nevada

Mohawk v. Key Motors of Reno, LLC

DecidedMarch 18, 2025

Docket3:24-cv-00193

StatusUnknown

This text of Mohawk v. Key Motors of Reno, LLC (Mohawk v. Key Motors of Reno, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mohawk v. Key Motors of Reno, LLC, (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * *

4 DESIREE MOHAWK, Case No. 3:24-CV-00193-ART-CLB

5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE JOINT PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING 6 v. ORDER

7 KEY MOTORS OF RENO, LLC, et al.,

8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff Desiree Mohawk (“Mohawk”) initiated this action on April 29, 2024 by filing 11 a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Ultimately, 12 the Court denied Mohawk’s IFP application and ordered her to pay the filing fee. (See 13 ECF No. 7.) Mohawk paid the filing fee on June 20, 2024, (ECF No. 8), and the complaint 14 was filed on August 16, 2024, (ECF No. 10). Summons were issued that same day. (ECF 15 No. 11.) On January 13, 2025, Defendant Tom Cheers (“Cheers”) filed a motion to 16 dismiss.1 (ECF No. 13.) On January 14, 2025, the Court ordered the parties to submit a 17 joint case management report by Friday, February 28, 2025. (See ECF No. 16). The 18 parties failed to do so. Additionally, the parties failed to submit their Stipulated Discovery 19 Plan and Scheduling Order. (See ECF No. 13). Thus, the Court granted a sua sponte 20 extension to March 12, 2025 to file their joint case management report and Proposed 21 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 28.) On March 12, 2025, Mohawk filed 22 her case management report. (ECF No. 29.) However, Cheers has failed to comply. 23 Further, the parties have not submitted a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling 24 Order. 25

26 1 To the extent Cheers believes that the filing of his motion to dismiss stayed discovery, this is not the case. See, e.g., Ministerio Roca Solida v. U.S. Dep't of Fish & 27 Wildlife, 288 F.R.D. 500, 2013 WL 150185, *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013) (“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery when 28 a potentially dispositive motion is pending.”); Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011) (same). 1 Accordingly, the parties SHALL SUBMIT their joint Proposed Stipulated 2 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, in accordance with LR 26-1, on or 3 before Friday, March 21, 2025. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in sanctions. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: March 18, 2025 . 7 soon he 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * *

4 DESIREE MOHAWK, Case No. 3:24-CV-00193-ART-CLB

5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE JOINT PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING 6 v. ORDER

7 KEY MOTORS OF RENO, LLC, et al.,

8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff Desiree Mohawk (“Mohawk”) initiated this action on April 29, 2024 by filing 11 a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Ultimately, 12 the Court denied Mohawk’s IFP application and ordered her to pay the filing fee. (See 13 ECF No. 7.) Mohawk paid the filing fee on June 20, 2024, (ECF No. 8), and the complaint 14 was filed on August 16, 2024, (ECF No. 10). Summons were issued that same day. (ECF 15 No. 11.) On January 13, 2025, Defendant Tom Cheers (“Cheers”) filed a motion to 16 dismiss.1 (ECF No. 13.) On January 14, 2025, the Court ordered the parties to submit a 17 joint case management report by Friday, February 28, 2025. (See ECF No. 16). The 18 parties failed to do so. Additionally, the parties failed to submit their Stipulated Discovery 19 Plan and Scheduling Order. (See ECF No. 13). Thus, the Court granted a sua sponte 20 extension to March 12, 2025 to file their joint case management report and Proposed 21 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 28.) On March 12, 2025, Mohawk filed 22 her case management report. (ECF No. 29.) However, Cheers has failed to comply. 23 Further, the parties have not submitted a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling 24 Order. 25

26 1 To the extent Cheers believes that the filing of his motion to dismiss stayed discovery, this is not the case. See, e.g., Ministerio Roca Solida v. U.S. Dep't of Fish & 27 Wildlife, 288 F.R.D. 500, 2013 WL 150185, *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013) (“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery when 28 a potentially dispositive motion is pending.”); Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011) (same). 1 Accordingly, the parties SHALL SUBMIT their joint Proposed Stipulated 2 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, in accordance with LR 26-1, on or 3 before Friday, March 21, 2025. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in sanctions. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: March 18, 2025 . 7 soon he 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mohawk v. Key Motors of Reno, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohawk-v-key-motors-of-reno-llc-nvd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack