Mohan v. Easton Radiology Associates, P.C.
This text of 911 A.2d 505 (Mohan v. Easton Radiology Associates, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. It is further ordered that the Order of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of the trial court is VACATED.
This Court concludes that the Superior Court erred in finding that the trial court’s sua sponte entry of a directed verdict was harmless error, as its determination was premised upon an issue also raised sua sponte by the trial court. This is, in itself, reversible error. See, Zeigler v. Church of the Brethren General Board, 570 Pa. 2, 807 A.2d 872 (2002). Therefore, it is hereby ordered that this case be REMANDED to the Superior Court with instructions to remand the matter to the trial court for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
911 A.2d 505, 590 Pa. 7, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 2083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohan-v-easton-radiology-associates-pc-pa-2006.