Mohammed Zahirrudin v. RS 6600 SW Fwy, LP
Opinion
Motion Denied; Order filed November 15, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-11-00716-CV
MOHAMMED ZAHIRRUDIN, Appellant
V.
RS 6600 SW FWY, LP, Appellee
On Appeal from the 125th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2009-71889
ORDER
On October 30, 2012, appellee filed an “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.”
Because the motion did not comply with this court’s local rule, on November 6, 2012, we ordered the parties to file a motion in compliance with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Local Rule 4(f) (“If [an e-filed] document requires the signature of an opposing party, the e-filer must e-file the document as a scanned image containing the opposing party’s signature.”).
On November 7, 2012, appellee filed an “Amended Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” The motion was signed by appellee’s attorney and by “Mohammed
Zahirruddin/ by permission.” Appellant, Mohammed Zahirruddin, is not represented by counsel. The Rules of Appellate Procedure require a party who is not represented by counsel to sign any document the party files. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.1(b) (“A party not represented by counsel must sign any document that the party files and give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, and fax number, if any.”).
The motion to dismiss is denied for failure to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally, and Mirabal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mohammed Zahirrudin v. RS 6600 SW Fwy, LP (Mohammed Zahirrudin v. RS 6600 SW Fwy, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.