Mohammed v. State
This text of 591 So. 2d 1062 (Mohammed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for capital sexual battery. We also affirm his conviction for burglary, but reverse this sentence. The trial court imposed a consecutive seven-year sentence of imprisonment for the burglary. No score-sheet was prepared for this sentence and thus we cannot determine whether the sentence constitutes a departure. See Lamb v. State, 532 So.2d 1051 (Fla.1988); Newsome v. State, 546 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse the burglary sentence and remand for resentencing.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 So. 2d 1062, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13480, 1991 WL 275543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammed-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.