Mohammed v. Freeman
738 S.E.2d 389, 366 N.C. 561, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 279, 2013 WL 991669
Opinion
1. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for NOA (COAP12-1012)
2. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for PDR
3. Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
1. Dismissed ex mero motu
2. Denied
3. Allowed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mohammed v. Freeman, 738 S.E.2d 389, 366 N.C. 561, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 279, 2013 WL 991669 (N.C. 2013).
738 S.E.2d 389 (Mohammed v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.