Mohammed v. Bush
This text of Mohammed v. Bush (Mohammed v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ FARHI SAEED BIN MOHAMMED, : et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-1347 (GK) : GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., : : Respondents. : ______________________________:
ORDER
A Status Conference was held in this case on January 15, 2009.
Upon consideration of the representations of the parties, and the
entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED, that parties are to submit any briefing in support of
their view of the appropriate definition of “enemy combatant” by
January 28, 2009; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Petitioner’s Opposition to the Respondents’
Motion to Clarify, Reconsider, or Amend Three Case Management Order
Provisions and to Stay Those Obligations Pending Resolution of This
Motion and Any Appeal, if any, is due by January 26, 2009.
Respondent’s reply is due by February 2, 2009; and it is further
ORDERED, that within one week of the date of this Order,
Petitioners shall provide Respondents with a realistic list that
prioritizes the exculpatory evidence they are requesting. By
January 30, 2009, Respondents will inform Petitioners as to whether
those requests can be satisfied; and it is further ORDERED, that parties shall meet and confer to narrow the
universe of facts that Petitioner will request to be de-classified.
Within one week of the date of this Order, Petitioners shall
provide Respondents with a realistic list that prioritizes those
factual issues which Petitioners request to be de-classified.
Within five business days of receiving that list, Respondents will
inform Petitioners as to whether those requests can be satisfied.
If Petitioner is not satisfied by Respondent’s reply, he will file
a Motion to Compel as soon as possible. Respondents will have five
business says to respond to the Motion. Filings shall be limited
to 10 pages or less; and it is further
ORDERED, that Petitioner shall file his Traverse by February
18, 2009; and it is further
ORDERED, that the parties shall file a Joint Report on
discovery no later than February 17, 2009.
/s/ January 15, 2009 Gladys Kessler United States District Judge
Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mohammed v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammed-v-bush-dcd-2009.