Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 16, 2013·No. 14-13-00024-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed, May 16, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00024-CV

MOHAMMED KHAN AND TASNEEM KHAN, Appellant

V.

SAFECO SURPLUS LINES, CRAWFORD & COMPANY AND GARY WHIGHTSIL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 04-DCV-135176

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 09, 2013. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. Appellant has been found indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Appellant has provided this court with evidence the record has been requested.

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil (Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.