Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil
This text of Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil (Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed, May 16, 2013.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00024-CV ____________
MOHAMMED KHAN AND TASNEEM KHAN, Appellant
V.
SAFECO SURPLUS LINES, CRAWFORD & COMPANY AND GARY WHIGHTSIL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 04-DCV-135176
ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due May 09, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. Appellant has been found indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Appellant has provided this court with evidence the record has been requested. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Elizabeth Wittu, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mohammed Khan v. Safeco Surplus Lines, Crawford & Company and Gary Whightsil, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammed-khan-v-safeco-surplus-lines-crawford-comp-texapp-2013.