Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan v. Barack H. Obama
This text of Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan v. Barack H. Obama (Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan v. Barack H. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ABDAL RAZAK ALI (ISN 685), ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-cv-745 (RCL) ) BARACK OBAMA, ) President of the United States, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
Before the Court are petitioner’s Motion [1316] for Additional Discovery, respondents’
Motion [1324] for Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner’s Discovery Request and to File
Respondents Motion for Judgment on the Record, respondents’ Consent Motion [1345] for
Second Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner’s Proposed Factual Return for Public Filing,
and respondents’ Motion [1347] for Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner’s Proposed
Factual Return for Public Filing. Upon consideration of the motions, the oppositions and replies
thereto, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that respondents’ motion [1324] for extension of time to respond to
petitioner’s discovery requested is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; it is further
ORDERED that respondents’ opposition filed on October 28, 2009 shall be deemed
timely filed; it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to the Case Management Order, as amended by Judge Walton
[797], respondents’ motion for judgment on the record is due within fourteen days of this Order,
and petitioner’s opposition and, if appropriate, cross-motion for judgment on the record is due fourteen days thereafter; it is further
ORDERED that petitioner’s motion [1316] for additional discovery is DENIED for
failure to comply with Rule 7(m) of the Local Civil Rules; it is further
ORDERED that respondents’ consent motion [1345] for second extension of time to
respond to petitioner’s proposed factual return for public filing is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; and
it is further
ORDERED that respondents’ motion [1347] for extension of time to respond to
petitioner’s proposed factual return for public filing is GRANTED. Respondents shall have until
January 18, 2010 to respond to petitioner’s proposed factual return.
SO ORDERED.
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on January 5, 20010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan v. Barack H. Obama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammed-abdullah-taha-mattan-v-barack-h-obama-dcd-2010.