Mohammed Abdallah Omran v. Steve Prator
This text of Mohammed Abdallah Omran v. Steve Prator (Mohammed Abdallah Omran v. Steve Prator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 17-30680 Document: 00514549500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 17-30680 July 11, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN ABDALLAH OMRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
STEVE PRATOR; ROBERT WYCHE; DIRECTOR HICKS; CHAPLAIN WHITTIKER,
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:14-CV-2426
Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mohammed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran asserted claims based on the denial of his request for kosher or halal food while he was detained in the Caddo Correctional Center, and we affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants. See Omran v. Prator, 674 F. App’x 353, 354-55 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 74 (2017).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-30680 Document: 00514549500 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2018
No. 17-30680
Following that appeal, Omran filed a motion pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from the judgment in order to amend his complaint to assert an equal protection claim. Omran now appeals the denial of that motion. Omran’s arguments regarding his entitlement to Rule 60 relief were not presented to the district court and are raised for the first time on appeal. He has therefore waived all of his arguments on appeal, and we perceive no extraordinary circumstances that might justify consideration of those arguments. See Morris v. Livingston, 739 F.3d 740, 752-53 (5th Cir. 2014); Mick Haig Prods. E.K. v. Does 1-670, 687 F.3d 649, 650, 652 (5th Cir. 2012). AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mohammed Abdallah Omran v. Steve Prator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammed-abdallah-omran-v-steve-prator-ca5-2018.