Mohammed A. Ragheb v. AFC Companies LLC, Hany Abdelmalek, Firas Al Batainah, and France Limousine Co.
This text of Mohammed A. Ragheb v. AFC Companies LLC, Hany Abdelmalek, Firas Al Batainah, and France Limousine Co. (Mohammed A. Ragheb v. AFC Companies LLC, Hany Abdelmalek, Firas Al Batainah, and France Limousine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed November 25, 2024
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00933-CV
MOHAMMED A. RAGHEB, Appellant V. AFC COMPANIES LLC, HANY ABDELMALEK, FIRAS AL BATAINAH, AND FRANCE LIMOUSINE CO., Appellees
On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-23-03988
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith Opinion by Justice Reichek We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court’s
December 1, 2023 final summary judgment as it appeared untimely filed. See
Mitschke v. Borromeo, 645 S.W.3d 251, 260 (Tex. 2022) (timely filing of notice of
appeal is jurisdictional). As reflected in the record, a motion for new trial was filed
on December 29, 2023, making the notice of appeal due February 29, 2024, or with
an extension motion, March 15, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.1(a) (together
providing that notice of appeal is due within thirty days of date judgment is signed,
or with timely filed motion for new trial, within ninety days of judgment), 26.3 (providing fifteen-day extension period); see also TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(d) (motion
for new trial is timely if filed within thirty days of judgment). The notice of appeal,
however, was not filed until August 5, 2024.
At our direction, appellant filed a jurisdictional letter brief. In the letter brief,
appellant asserted the notice of appeal was timely because it was filed within thirty
days of the trial court’s July 24, 2024 order denying the new trial motion. The
deadline for filing a notice of appeal, however, runs from the date of judgment not
the date the order denying a new trial motion is signed. See Puckett v. Frizzell, 402
S.W.2d 148, 151 (Tex. 1966); Bryer v. Millennium Rest. Grp. Inc., No. 05-19-00915-
CV, 2019 WL 4126609, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 30, 2019, no pet.) (mem.
op.).
Because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed untimely, we dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Amanda L. Reichek// 240933f.p05 AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MOHAMMED A. RAGHEB, On Appeal from the 298th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-23-03988. No. 05-24-00933-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek, Justices Molberg and Smith AFC COMPANIES LLC, HANY participating. ABDELMALEK, FIRAS AL BATAINAH, AND FRANCE LIMOUSINE CO., Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered this 25th day of November, 2024.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mohammed A. Ragheb v. AFC Companies LLC, Hany Abdelmalek, Firas Al Batainah, and France Limousine Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammed-a-ragheb-v-afc-companies-llc-hany-abdelmalek-firas-al-texapp-2024.