Mohammad v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ex rel. U.S. Bank NA

Fourth Circuit

Mohammad v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ex rel. U.S. Bank NA

606 F. App'x 111

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1176

StatusPublished

This text of 606 F. App'x 111 (Mohammad v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ex rel. U.S. Bank NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mohammad v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ex rel. U.S. Bank NA, 606 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Furqan Mohammad and Azra Yasmin appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief from the automatic stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mohammad v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., No. l:14-cv-01305-AJT-TRJ (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Furqan Mohammad and Azra Yasmin appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief from the automatic stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mohammad v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., No. l:14-cv-01305-AJT-TRJ (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

606 F. App'x 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammad-v-select-portfolio-servicing-inc-ex-rel-us-bank-na-ca4-2015.