Mohammad Q Mahmood v. Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mohammad Q Mahmood v. Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 5, 2020·No. 03-19-00915-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 5, 2020

NO. 03-19-00915-CV

Mohammad Q Mahmood, Appellant

v.

Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 5, 2020

NO. 03-19-00915-CV

Mohammad Q Mahmood, Appellant

v.

Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Mohammad Q Mahmood v. Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Mohammad Q Mahmood v. Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward (Mohammad Q Mahmood v. Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward, and Susan Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.