Mohamed v. Unifruitco Steamship Co.
This text of 223 A.D. 791 (Mohamed v. Unifruitco Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint modified by adding thereto a provision that the question of fact as to the execution of the general release by plaintiff be tried by a jury, the findings to be reported to the court for its action as provided in Civil Practice Rule 108; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. (Galanti v. Brady & Gioe, Inc., 211 App. Div. 858; Rizzuto v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 213 id. 326.) Lazansky, P. J.,'Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamed-v-unifruitco-steamship-co-nyappdiv-1928.