Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 579 F.3d 943
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2009·No. 08-15693·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BINYAM MOHAMED; ABOU ELKASSIM  BRITEL; AHMED AGIZA; MOHAMED FARAG AHMAD BASHMILAH; BISHER AL-RAWI, No. 08-15693 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.  D.C. No. 5:07-CV-02798-JW JEPPESEN DATAPLAN, INC., ORDER Defendant-Appellee, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Appellee.  Filed October 27, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Reinhardt, McKeown, Gould, Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Ikuta did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

14743 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., (9th Cir. 2009).

Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. (Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arar v. Ashcroft
585 F.3d 559 (Second Circuit, 2009)