Mohamed v. Gates

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mohamed v. Gates. Read the opinion of the Court — 624 F. Supp. 2d 40
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 26, 2009·No. Civil Action No. 2008-1789·Published

Opinion

CaSe ‘lIOS-Cv-Ol 789-RWR

1N THE uNrrED srArEs DISTRICT CoURT _ w g FoR THI~: Dlsriucr oF CoLuMBm F §_ E "

..§UN 2 5 2009

ISMAIL MoHAMED, "“"°Y CLERK Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 08-1789 (RWR)

ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, United States Department of Defense,

Respondent.

\/\./S§\_/é\/&/\J§/\/é§/

[PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Status Report filed June 24, 2009, hereby

ORDERS that Respondent make arrangements to allow Petitioner Ismail Mohamed (ISN 10027) to spend 3 day(s) (9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) in a meeting room at Camp Echo to review the declassifled, For Official Use Only (FOUO) versions of his statements included in the Factual Retum. Standard procedures for lunch and prayer time will be followed. Standard procedures for notifying, moving, and securing Petitioner will also be in place. If Petitioner refuses to go to the meeting room or asks to leave the meeting room at any point during the day, Guantanamo Bay personnel will not force him to go to or to remain in the meeting room. Petitioner will not be allowed to bring anything into the meeting room but will be supplied with a pen and note paper, on which he would be allowed to take notes. Petitioner will be allowed to retain his notes

so long as they are not word-for-word copies of the FOUO documents or substantial portions

thereof.

Case 1:O8-cv-01789-RVVR

l¢\ IT is so oRDERED, this 2 5 day of Jwt< , 2009.

Awt;¢,z;

Richard W. Roberts United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohamed v. Gates, (D.D.C. 2009).

Mohamed v. Gates (Mohamed v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.