Mohamed v. Dillard
This text of Mohamed v. Dillard (Mohamed v. Dillard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 District Judge Jamal N. Whitehead
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE
9 AMINA ALI MOHAMED, Case No. 2:24-cv-01799-JNW 10 Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD 11 v. CASE IN ABEYANCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 12 MARC D. DILLARD, et al.,1 Noted for Consideration: 13 Defendants. March 6, 2025
14 15 Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule 16 of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and move to 17 continue to stay these proceedings through April 9, 2025. Plaintiff brings this litigation pursuant 18 to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel Defendants 19 to readjudicate Plaintiff’s husband’s immigrant visa application. This case is currently stayed 20 through March 10, 2025. Dkt. No. 7, Order. For good cause, the parties request that the Court 21 continue to hold this case in abeyance through April 9, 2025. 22 23 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Defendants substitute Secretary of State Marco Rubio for 24 former Secretary Antony Blinken. 1 Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 2 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to 3 control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for
4 counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 5 With additional time, this case may be resolved without the need of further judicial 6 intervention. Plaintiff’s husband’s visa application remains refused under 8 U.S.C. § 1201(g) for 7 required security screening. Security screening was very recently completed. The consular officer 8 at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi expects to review the visa application file to determine the 9 additional steps required in processing the visa application. Additional time is required for this 10 process to continue. 11 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the instant action be stayed until April 9, 12 2025. The parties will submit a joint status report on or before April 9, 2025. 13 DATED this 6th day of March, 2025.
14 Respectfully submitted,
15 TEAL LUTHY MILLER GOLDSTEIN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS Acting United States Attorney 16 s/ Michelle R. Lambert s/Joshua L. Goldstein 17 MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 JOSHUA L. GOLDSTEIN, WSBA# 61773 Assistant United States Attorney Goldstein Immigration Lawyers 18 United States Attorney’s Office 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste. 317 Western District of Washington Los Angeles, California 90017 19 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 Phone: 213-425-1979 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Email: jg@jgoldlaw.com 20 Phone: (206) 553-7970 Attorneys for Plaintiff Fax: (206) 553-4067 21 Email: michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov
22 Attorneys for Defendants
23 I certify that this memorandum contains 269 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules. 24 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 The case is held in abeyance until April 9, 2025. The parties shall submit a joint status 3 report on or before April 9, 2025. It is so ORDERED.
4 5 DATED this 7th day of March, 2025. 6 7 A 8 JAMAL N. WHITEHEAD United States District Judge 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mohamed v. Dillard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamed-v-dillard-wawd-2025.