Mohamed v. Commonwealth

982 A.2d 1218, 603 Pa. 136, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2205
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 16, 2009
DocketPetition No. 356 MAL 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 982 A.2d 1218 (Mohamed v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mohamed v. Commonwealth, 982 A.2d 1218, 603 Pa. 136, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2205 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the interlocutory order of the Commonwealth Court, dated May 4, 2009, is GRANTED. We [137]*137assume plenary jurisdiction over Petitioner’s appeal as a sua sponte exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction. 42 Pa.C.S. § 726; Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380, 899 A.2d 1103, 1108 (2006). The issue on appeal, consolidated and rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Petitioner’s request for relief under 42 Pa.C.S. § 933(a) and transferring the matter to the court of common pleas?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vaccone v. Syken
899 A.2d 1103 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 A.2d 1218, 603 Pa. 136, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamed-v-commonwealth-pa-2009.