Mohamed v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles
This text of 982 A.2d 1218 (Mohamed v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the interlocutory order of the Commonwealth Court, dated May 4, 2009, is GRANTED. We assume plenary jurisdiction over Petitioner’s appeal as a sua sponte exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction. 42 Pa.C.S. § 726; Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380, 899 A.2d 1103, 1108 (2006). The issue on appeal, consolidated and rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Petitioner’s request for relief under 42 Pa.C.S. § 933(a) and transferring the matter to the court of common pleas?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
982 A.2d 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamed-v-commonwealth-department-of-transportation-bureau-of-motor-pa-2009.